Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37800658›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2023

Survival outcomes and surgical morbidity based on surgical approach to pulmonary metastasectomy in pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients with osteosarcoma.

Christopher Kuo, Jemily Malvar, Yueh-Yun Chi, Eugene S Kim, Rachana Shah, Fariba Navid, James E Stein, Leo Mascarenhas

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher KuoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-147X
Jemily MalvarDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Yueh-Yun ChiDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Eugene S KimKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rachana ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Fariba NavidDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
James E SteinKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Leo MascarenhasDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of Southern California · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracotomy is considered the standard surgical approach for the management of pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma (OST). Several studies have identified the advantages of a thoracoscopic approach, however, the clinical significance of thoracotomy compared to thoracoscopy is yet to be evaluated in a randomized trial.

aimsThe primary aim was to determine the survival outcomes in OST patients based on surgical approach for pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) and secondary aim was to assess the post-operative morbidities of OST PM through various surgical approaches. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a single institution retrospective study to compare survival outcomes and surgical morbidity according to the surgical approach of the management of pulmonary metastases in patients with OST.

resultsSixty-one patients with OST underwent PM. Twenty-one patients were metastatic at diagnosis and underwent PM during primary treatment; nine had thoracotomy, six thoracoscopy, and six combined thoracoscopy with thoracotomy (CTT). Forty-three patients with first pulmonary relapse or progression underwent PM; 18 had thoracotomy, 16 thoracoscopy and nine CTT. There was no difference in survival between surgical approaches. There were significantly more postoperative morbidities associated with thoracotomy for initial PM (pain and postoperative chest tube placement), and for PM at first relapse (pneumothoraces, pain, Foley catheter use and prolonged hospitalizations).

conclusionOur study demonstrates that patients with OST pulmonary metastases have comparable poor outcomes despite varying surgical approaches for PM. There were significantly more postoperative morbidities associated with thoracotomy for PM. Surgical bias and other competing risks could not be assessed given the limitations of a retrospective study and may be addressed in a prospective trial evaluating surgical approach for PM in OST.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMetastasectomyOsteosarcomaAdolescentChildHumansMorbidityPainProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesThoracotomyYoung Adultosteosarcomapulmonary metastasectomythoracoscopythoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID37800658
PMCPMC10652329
OpenAlexW4387391888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.