ArticleOpen life sciences2023
A novel approach for minimising anti-aliasing effects in EEG data acquisition.
Article in Open life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A flexible piezoelectric sensor for non-contact monitoring of respiratory and heart rates: accuracy and clinical feasibility under simulated dental treatment conditions.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- A Multi-Branch Network for Integrating Spatial, Spectral, and Temporal Features in Motor Imagery EEG Classification.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) waves and other biological signals can be deciphered with a deeper understanding of the human body. The benefits of EEG are growing. EEG studies have expanded globally. Research on EEG covers data gathering, analysis, energy renewal, and more. EEG-gathering devices include encoding, digital transfer, head sensor placement, and separate amplifiers. The EEG detects periodic noise. Head movement, sensor lines, and hair sweat produce low-frequency noise. Low-frequency noise alters EEG signals over time. Muscle actions and electromagnetic waves create high-frequency noise (especially in the facial and neck muscles). EEG shifts are saw-toothed by high-frequency noise. High- and low-frequency noises are usually lower and higher than human EEG, respectively. Lowering signal power above and below the testing level without altering the signs of interest lowers noise. Aliasing may affect low-frequency impacts in the original data because high-frequency noise is mirrored in the data. This work designed a non-binary Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) Consecutive guesstimate register (CGR) reconfigurable analogue-to-digital converter (ADC) integrated with the instrumental amplifier. CGR ADC model comprises the bio-signal device monitoring for the EEG signals. This study focused on acquiring the EEG signals for amplification. The model uses the AC-coupled chopper stabilisation model with 1 A low power with a noise level of 1 A. The neural amplifier uses an optimised current technique to maximise the transconductance for a good noise efficiency factor. The simulation analysis estimates a bandwidth range of 0.05-120 Hz with a power consumption level of 0.271 µW. The computed noise level is observed as 1.1 µV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.