Analyzing captive breeding outcomes to inform reintroduction practice: lessons from the pookila (

Kiarrah J Smith, Maldwyn J Evans, Iain J Gordon, Jennifer C Pierson, Jenny Newport, Adrian D Manning

Open access · hybridAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammalogy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

Editorial: Community series in the wildlife gut microbiome and its implication for conservation biology, volume II.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Kiarrah J SmithFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3131-3646

Maldwyn J EvansFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-2287

Iain J GordonFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-0946

Jennifer C PiersonFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-010X

Jenny NewportFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.

Adrian D ManningFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-9203

Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Captive breeding is often used to produce individuals for reintroduction programs in order to reestablish a species in an area where it has become locally extinct. To maximize the likelihood of establishing a self-sustaining population in the wild, an analysis of data from captive breeding programs is commonly undertaken to (1) increase the

Indexed as

captive breedingconservationreintroductionreproductionrodenttranslocation tactics

Identifiers

PMID37800101

DOI10.1093/jmammal/gyad056

PMCPMC10550247

OpenAlexW4381714302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.