Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799943›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2023

Ten years of a geriatric oncology service at a public university cancer centre in Brazil.

Theodora Karnakis, Ana L Kanaji, Isabella F Gattás-Vernaglia, Izabela O Adriazola, Paola T Ramos, Maria Eduarda P L S Lima, Olga L S Almeida, Wilson Jacob-Filho, Eduardo Ferriolli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theodora KarnakisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana L KanajiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabella F Gattás-VernagliaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Izabela O AdriazolaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paola T RamosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda P L S LimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olga L S AlmeidaClinical Board of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Wilson Jacob-FilhoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo FerriolliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of a geriatric oncology service is challenging in both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. The Octavio Frias de Oliveira Institute of Cancer of Sao Paulo (ICESP) is a tertiary healthcare complex of the Clinics Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School and is considered a model of excellence in oncology in Latin America. The objective of this manuscript is to describe 10 years of the geriatric oncology service at ICESP and the challenges for its implementation. We performed a narrative description of the ICESP's geriatric oncology service and a general retrospective descriptive analysis of data collected from routine structured medical records of patients referred to the service from 2011 to 2021. This article highlights the different settings in which the service operates (outpatient, pre-operative and hospital follow-up). In this period, 1,700 patients were assessed for preoperative evaluation (median age 83.9, SD 4.95), 468 patients were evaluated for therapeutic decision (median age 79.4, SD 7.38), 968 in general geriatric oncology care outpatient clinics from 2012 to 2021 (median age 78.7, SD 7.91) and 1,391 inpatient evaluations. In the past 10 years, our geriatric oncology team has grown exponentially and changed its characteristics in order to adjust them to the hospital demands, raising awareness among the oncology teams about the benefit of using geriatric assessment and promoting multidisciplinary discussions.

Indexed as

aginggeriatric assessmentgeriatric oncologyhealth carehealth service researchLatin America

Identifiers

PMID37799943
PMCPMC10550289
OpenAlexW4387392280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.