ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Could the pulp be preserved in tooth with root resorption caused by embedded tooth?
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Prediction Model for External Root Resorption of the Second Molars Associated With Third Molars.International dental journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: At present, there are no recognized guidelines or consensus for the treatment strategy of the asymptomatic tooth with external root resorption caused by an embedded tooth (et-ERR). Most clinicians would like prophylactic or concomitant root canal therapy (RCT) along with the extraction of the embedded tooth. The purpose of this study was to report the prognosis of external root resorption (ERR) and investigate the possibility to preserve the vital pulp of ERR tooth. Materials and methods: The patients who had asymptomatic et-ERR teeth were included. After extraction of the embedded tooth, the clinical process, prognosis, and adverse events were observed, including symptoms, clinical, and radiographic examination throughout the follow-up period. Results: A total of four cases with special features were reported. Over a follow-up period of up to 12 months, on clinical examination, 3 ERR teeth preserved pulp vitality without additional intervention except for tooth extraction and have kept normal function free from any symptoms. Radiographic examination showed bone regeneration and recovery of periodontal tissue. While one case failed to keep the vital pulp and ended in intentional replantation. Conclusion: As to et-ERR, if the embedded tooth can be promptly extracted with a minimally invasive technique and effective infection control, the pulp vitality of the et-ERR tooth is likely to be preserved. In this situation, the preferred management of asymptomatic et-ERR tooth is just followed up without prophylactic RCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.