ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Mapping out the bibliometric characteristics of
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Diagnostic Methods and Imaging Technologies in Dentistry: A Literature Review of Emerging Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A scientometric study of syphilis research by dermatologists and stomatologists: Underpinning their roles in public health.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- A scientometric study of oral cancer research in South and Southeast Asia with emphasis on risk factors control.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- A scientometric and comparative study of Sjogren's syndrome research by rheumatologists and stomatologists.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Research impact beyond academia.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Characterizing the utilization of a federated clinical data network: A bibliometric analysis of TriNetX in Taiwan.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Since its inception, the Materials and method: Scopus® database was used to search the qualified articles published in Results: One hundred and eight articles from Scopus® database were eligible for analysis. The citation counts of Conclusion: Despite its limitations, the escalating trends in JIFs, and JIFs without self-citations, and inter-nation and inter-institute collaboration of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.