ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Evaluation of extended depth-of-focus hydrophobic intraocular lens with an optic concept based on combination of high-order aberrations.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of spectacle independence with the Dutch Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Observational
- Comparative Photopic and Mesopic Visual Performance of Enhanced Monofocal Versus Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the clinical outcomes of a novel EDOF intraocular lens: a functional classification approach.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Ocular biometric parameters associated with the performance of actual near-add power in multifocal intraocular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) provide a continuous range of uncorrected vision at different distances. Objective: To assess visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery using the LuxSmart EDOF IOL (Bausch+Lomb). Design: A two-center, prospective observational clinical study. Methods: This study includes patients who have undergone bilateral phacoemulsification with bilateral implantation of the LuxSmart EDOF IOL, with the aim of achieving emmetropia. Visual acuity (VA) and subjective refraction were obtained in all patients preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Subjective measures were obtained using the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and the Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ). Contrast sensitivity and a glare assessment were undertaken postoperatively. Safety outcomes were additionally assessed. Results: Sixty eyes from thirty patients were recruited for this study. The mean spherical equivalent was 1.04 ± 1.67 D preoperatively and -0.30 ± 0.46 D at 6 months. Monocular uncorrected distance VA was 0.57 ± 0.32 (logMAR) preoperatively and 0.09 ± 0.12 (logMAR) at 6 months. Mean 6-month monocular uncorrected VA was 0.11 ± 0.13, 0.12 ± 0.15, and 0.31 ± 0.15 (logMAR) at 80, 66, and 40 cm, respectively. More than 90% of patients were either fairly or very satisfied with their vision. There was one case of suspected vitreomacular traction postoperatively. Conclusion: The LuxSmart EDOF IOL offers good refractive, VA, and safety outcomes. The single elongated focal point designed to enhance the DOF shows good results for VA and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.