ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023
2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Deep Septal Pacing in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Impact of a Dual-Lead Technique on Procedural Success of Left Bundle Branch Pacing.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Deterioration of Cardiac Function Complicated by Ventricular Tachycardia After the Implantation of an Artificial Cardiac Pacemaker and Upgrading to CRT-D: One Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of left bundle branch area pacing and biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block with heart failure and mild-to-moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function: design and rationale of the BLOCK NAGOYA randomized clinical trial.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Implantation Success, Electrical Performance, and Safety of an Active Fixation Stylet-Driven Lead for LBBAP in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Experience.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Reconsidering Its Essence as a Treatment for Electrical Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Based Prediction Model for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders Using Electrocardiogram Data.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac mechanical synchrony couples with myocardial sympathetic innervation. A retrospective study with novel echocardiographic assessment in patients withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Assessing the Learning Curve in Conduction System Pacing Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Valvular and Ventricular Function After Right Ventricular, Leadless, Deep Septal, and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacemakers.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Article
- Clinical Considerations Regarding Pacemaker Syndrome Under VVIR Pacing.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Restoration of Cardiac Function in Left Bundle Branch Block-Induced Cardiomyopathy via Conduction System Pacing: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Implementation of lead V8 as a simple non-invasive tool to improve patient selection in cardiac resynchronization therapy and guide left ventricular lead placement.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Robotic-Assisted Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement in Patients With Prior Sternotomy.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025Article
- Left bundle branch area pacing in complex congenital heart disease: Overcoming access limitations in patients with unconventional central venous anatomy.HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
- Impact of magnetic fields from tablets, laptops, smartphones, and household/leisure magnets on cardiac implantable electronic devices.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Preserved LVEF: Adverse Effects and Mechanisms.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Evaluation of cardiac energetics in left bundle branch area pacing using noninvasive pressure-volume loops.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing With a Stylet-Driven Lead and Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
71 authors at 11 institutions in 16 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.