Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799789›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023

Adverse events in cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Insight from the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience.

Min Choon Tan, Jian Liang Tan, Wei Jun Lee, Komandoor Srivathsan, Dan Sorajja, Hicham El Masry, Luis R Scott, Justin Z Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Min Choon TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7682-8934
Jian Liang TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Wei Jun LeeInternational Medical University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
Komandoor SrivathsanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA.
Dan SorajjaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA.
Hicham El MasryDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA.
Luis R ScottDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA.
Justin Z LeeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USCleveland Clinic · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USIMU University · MYNew York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Real-world clinical data on the adverse events related to the use of cryoballoon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation remains limited. Objective: To report and describe the adverse events related to the use of Artic Front cryoballoon catheters (Arctic Front, Arctic Front Advance, and Arctic Front Advance Pro) reported in the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods: We reviewed all the adverse events reported to the FDA MAUDE database over a 10.7-year study period from January 01, 2011 to September 31, 2021. All events were independently reviewed by two physicians. Results: During the study period, a total of 320 procedural-related adverse events reported in the MAUDE database were identified. The most common adverse event was transient or persistent phrenic nerve palsy (PNP), accounting for 48% of all events. This was followed by cardiac perforation (15%), pulmonary vein stenosis (8%), transient ischemic attack or stroke (6%), vascular injury (4%), transient or persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction (3%), hemoptysis (2%), pericarditis (2%), and esophageal ulcer or fistula (1%). There were six reported intra-procedural death events as a result of cardiac perforation. Conclusion: The two most common procedural adverse events associated with cryoballoon ablation were PNP and cardiac perforation. All cases of procedural mortality were due to cardiac perforation.

Indexed as

adverse eventsatrial fibrillationcryoballoon ablationoutcome assessmentpulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID37799789
PMCPMC10549805
OpenAlexW4385215718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.