Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Interobserver variability in target definition for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation.

Martijn H van der Ree, Phillip S Cuculich, Marcel van Herk, Geoffrey D Hugo, Jippe C Balt, Matthew Bates, Gordon Ho, Etienne Pruvot, Claudia Herrera-Siklody, Wiert F Hoeksema and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Radiation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Martijn H van der ReeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Phillip S CuculichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Marcel van HerkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Manchester Academic Health Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey D HugoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jippe C BaltDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Matthew BatesDepartment of Cardiology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middleborough, United Kingdom.
Gordon HoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Etienne PruvotHeart and Vessel Department, Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claudia Herrera-SiklodyHeart and Vessel Department, Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Wiert F HoeksemaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Justin LeeDepartment of Immunity, Infection and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Michael S LloydSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michiel J B KemmeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frederic SacherCardiac Arrhythmia Department, IHU LIRYC, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Romain TixierCardiac Arrhythmia Department, IHU LIRYC, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Joost J C VerhoeffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Brian V BalgobindDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Clifford G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Coen R N RaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Pieter G PostemaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a potential new therapy for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The arrhythmogenic substrate (target) is synthesized from clinical and electro-anatomical information. This study was designed to evaluate the baseline interobserver variability in target delineation for STAR. Methods: Delineation software designed for research purposes was used. The study was split into three phases. Firstly, electrophysiologists delineated a well-defined structure in three patients (spinal canal). Secondly, observers delineated the VT-target in three patients based on case descriptions. To evaluate baseline performance, a basic workflow approach was used, no advanced techniques were allowed. Thirdly, observers delineated three predefined segments from the 17-segment model. Interobserver variability was evaluated by assessing volumes, variation in distance to the median volume expressed by the root-mean-square of the standard deviation (RMS-SD) over the target volume, and the Dice-coefficient. Results: Ten electrophysiologists completed the study. For the first phase interobserver variability was low as indicated by low variation in distance to the median volume (RMS-SD range: 0.02-0.02 cm) and high Dice-coefficients (mean: 0.97 ± 0.01). In the second phase distance to the median volume was large (RMS-SD range: 0.52-1.02 cm) and the Dice-coefficients low (mean: 0.40 ± 0.15). In the third phase, similar results were observed (RMS-SD range: 0.51-1.55 cm, Dice-coefficient mean: 0.31 ± 0.21). Conclusions: Interobserver variability is high for manual delineation of the VT-target and ventricular segments. This evaluation of the baseline observer variation shows that there is a need for methods and tools to improve variability and allows for future comparison of interventions aiming to reduce observer variation, for STAR but possibly also for catheter ablation.

Indexed as

cardiac radioablationinterobserver variabilitystereotactic arrhythmia radioablationstereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapyventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID37799779
PMCPMC10547862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.