ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Mapping optical scattering properties to physical particle information in singly and multiply scattering samples.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental airway adenocarcinoma-simulating phantom for endoscopic near-infrared optical coherence tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of retinal attenuation and backscattering in OCT imaging using iterative layer-based analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- 30 Years of Optical Coherence Tomography: introduction to the feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) leverages light scattering by biological tissues as endogenous contrast to form structural images. Light scattering behavior is dictated by the optical properties of the tissue, which depend on microstructural details at the cellular or sub-cellular level. Methods to measure these properties from OCT intensity data have been explored in the context of a number of biomedical applications seeking to access this sub-resolution tissue microstructure and thereby increase the diagnostic impact of OCT. Most commonly, the optical attenuation coefficient, an analogue of the scattering coefficient, has been used as a surrogate metric linking OCT intensity to subcellular particle characteristics. To record attenuation coefficient data that is accurately representative of the underlying physical properties of a given sample, it is necessary to account for the impact of the OCT imaging system itself on the distribution of light intensity in the sample, including the numerical aperture (NA) of the system and the location of the focal plane with respect to the sample surface, as well as the potential contribution of multiple scattering to the reconstructed intensity signal. Although these considerations complicate attenuation coefficient measurement and interpretation, a suitably calibrated system may potentiate a powerful strategy for gaining additional information about the scattering behavior and microstructure of samples. In this work, we experimentally show that altering the OCT system geometry minimally impacts measured attenuation coefficients in samples presumed to be singly scattering, but changes these measurements in more highly scattering samples. Using both depth-resolved attenuation coefficient data and layer-resolved backscattering coefficients, we demonstrate the retrieval of scattering particle diameter and concentration in tissue-mimicking phantoms, and the impact of presumed multiple scattering on these calculations. We further extend our approach to characterize a murine brain tissue sample and highlight a tumor-bearing region based on increased scattering particle density. Through these methods, we not only enhance conventional OCT attenuation coefficient analysis by decoupling the independent effects of particle size and concentration, but also discriminate areas of strong multiple scattering through minor changes to system topology to provide a framework for assessing the accuracy of these measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.