Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799631›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2022

Development of an IntelliCage-based cognitive bias test for mice.

Pia Kahnau, Anne Jaap, Birk Urmersbach, Kai Diederich, Lars Lewejohann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pia KahnauLaboratory Animal Science, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 10589, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-8624
Anne JaapLaboratory Animal Science, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Birk UrmersbachLaboratory Animal Science, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Kai DiederichLaboratory Animal Science, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Lars LewejohannLaboratory Animal Science, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 10589, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive bias test is used to measure the emotional state of animals with regard to future expectations. Thus, the test offers a unique possibility to assess animal welfare with regard to housing and testing conditions of laboratory animals. So far, however, performing such a test is time-consuming and requires the presence of an experimenter. Therefore, we developed an automated and home-cage based cognitive bias test based on the IntelliCage system. We present several developmental steps to improve the experimental design leading to a successful measurement of cognitive bias in group-housed female C57BL/6J mice. The automated and home-cage based test design allows to obtain individual data from group-housed mice, to test the mice in their familiar environment, and during their active phase. By connecting the test-cage to the home-cage via a gating system, the mice participated in the test on a self-chosen schedule, indicating high motivation to actively participate in the experiment. We propose that this should have a positive effect on the animals themselves as well as on the data. Unexpectedly, the mice showed an optimistic cognitive bias after enrichment was removed and additional restraining. An optimistic expectation of the future as a consequence of worsening environmental conditions, however, can also be interpreted as an active coping strategy in which a potential profit is sought to be maximized through a higher willingness to take risks.

Indexed as

cognitive biasconditioninghome-cage basedIntelliCagejudgment biaslearning behaviormice

Identifiers

PMID37799631
PMCPMC10548109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.