Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799613›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in improving skin symptoms in patients with dermatomyositis: a post-hoc analysis of the ProDERM study.

Victoria P Werth, Rohit Aggarwal, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Joachim Schessl, Todd Levine, Norbert Kopasz, Margitta Worm, Zsuzsanna Bata-Csörgő

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02728752 (Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Octagam 10% in Patients With Dermatomyositis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02728752 phase3completednot on this map

Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Octagam 10% in Patients With Dermatomyositis ("ProDERM Study")

TypeinterventionalSponsorOctapharmaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled95ConditionsDermatomyositisArmsOctagam 10%, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Victoria P WerthCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rohit AggarwalUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christina Charles-SchoemanUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joachim SchesslDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Todd LevineHonorHealth Neurology, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Norbert KopaszOctapharma AG, Lachen, Switzerland.
Margitta WormClinic of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Zsuzsanna Bata-CsörgőDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHonorHealth · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEOctapharma (Switzerland) · CHPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by skin involvement, with or without proximal muscle weakness. Recently, following the ProDERM study, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was approved for treatment of DM. Until ProDERM evidence from large, placebo-controlled studies supporting its use for dermatological symptoms, was lacking. Here we present efficacy data from ProDERM of IVIg versus placebo for treatment of the cutaneous aspect of DM. Methods: ProDERM was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Phase 3 study. In the First Period (Weeks 0-16), adults with active DM received 2.0 g/kg IVIg (Octagam 10%; Octapharma AG) or placebo every 4 weeks. In the open-label Extension Period (Weeks 16-40), all patients received IVIg for 6 additional cycles. Cutaneous disease was assessed using measures including modified cutaneous DM disease area and severity index activity (CDASI-A) and damage (CDASI-D) scores, and myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT) including visual analogue scale (VAS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02728752. Findings: The study took place from February 2017 to November 2019. 95 patients received IVIg (N = 47) or placebo (N = 48) in the First Period. Together, 664 IVIg infusion cycles were administered (median dose, 2.0 g/kg). At Week 16, mean CDASI-A change from baseline was -9.36 (95% CI: -12.52, -6.19) in the IVIg group versus -1.16 (-3.32, 0.99) in placebo group (p < 0.0001). At the end of the Extension Period, mean changes from baseline were -10.44 (95% CI: -13.94, -6.94) and -10.03 (-13.12, -6.94), respectively. Similar changes were seen for CDASI-D and VAS of MDAAT. These observations were seen regardless of baseline disease severity. Interpretation: ProDERM is the first large prospective, randomized trial to demonstrate the efficacy of IVIg to improve the cutaneous manifestations of DM. IVIg treatment significantly improved dermatological symptoms in patients with DM, regardless of disease severity before treatment, suggesting that IVIg is effective for even the most severe cutaneous DM. Funding: This study was sponsored by Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges m.b.H.

Indexed as

Assessment toolCutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity indexCutaneous symptomDermatomyositisIntravenous immunoglobulinSkin

Identifiers

PMID37799613
PMCPMC10550512
OpenAlexW4387251773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.