ArticleDigital health
Cervical cancer detection using K nearest neighbor imputer and stacked ensemble learningmodel.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-based risk assessment tools for sexual, reproductive and mental health: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cytology: Opportunities and Limitations in Screening, Triage, and Diagnostic Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SysML: adaptive recommendation system for heterogeneous biomedical data preprocessing and modeling workflows.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Colposcopy: Diagnostic Accuracy for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Review
- Predicting delayed antenatal care initiation among pregnant women in East Africa: using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Machine-learning-based model for analysing and accurately predicting factors related to burnout in healthcare workers.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Divulging Patterns: An Analytical Review for Machine Learning Methodologies for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cervical cancer stands as a leading cause of mortality among women in developing nations. To ensure the reduction of its adverse consequences, the primary protocols to be adhered to involve early detection and treatment under the guidance of expert medical professionals. An effective approach for identifying this form of malignancy involves the examination of Pap smear images. However, in the context of automating cervical cancer detection, many of the existing datasets frequently exhibit missing data points, a factor that can substantially impact the effectiveness of machine learning models. Methods: In response to these hurdles, this research introduces an automated system designed to predict cervical cancer with a dual focus: adeptly managing missing data while attaining remarkable accuracy. The system's core is built upon a stacked ensemble voting classifier model, which amalgamates three distinct machine learning models, all harmoniously integrated with the KNN Imputer to address the issue of missing values. Results: The model put forth attains an accuracy of 99.41%, precision of 97.63%, recall of 95.96%, and an F1 score of 96.76% when incorporating the KNN imputation method. The investigation conducts a comparative analysis, contrasting the performance of this model with seven alternative machine learning algorithms in two scenarios: one where missing values are eliminated, and another employing KNN imputation. This study offers validation of the effectiveness of the proposed model in comparison to current state-of-the-art methodologies. Conclusions: This research delves into the challenge of handling missing data in the dataset utilized for cervical cancer detection. The findings have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in achieving early detection and enhancing the quality of care provided to individuals affected by cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.