ArticleDigital health
A virtual reality physical activity pattern assessment: Mixed crossover experiments and cluster analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the relationship between perceived social support and pregnant women's physical activity behavior: a chain-mediated effect test.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The subjects' physical activity levels and enjoyment of exercise after 15 min of virtual reality (VR) physical activity of different intensities were compared. Methods: Thirty-two subjects were selected for a mixed crossover experiment. They were randomly assigned to exercise in three VR games with different exercise intensities. Acceleration data of the subjects were collected and subjects' exercise enjoyment and exercise levels were compared. The subjects' emotional efficacy and arousal during exercise were measured and evaluated using the Feeling Scale (FS) and the Felt Arousal Scale (FAS), and the acceleration data were evaluated by clustering using the fuzzy c-mean (FCM) clustering algorithm. Results: A one-way ANOVA was performed on FS and FAS before and after VR physical activity, P overall Conclusion: VR physical activity enhances subjects' sense of enjoyment of exercise and emotional arousal, with moderate intensity VR physical activity having the best effect. VR physical activity is skewed toward high upper-extremity activity and low lower-extremity activity. The combined intensity of VR physical activity matches that of traditional exercise, and it can achieve the workout effect of the traditional workout modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.