Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799356›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2023

Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris.

Mona L Alqam, Brian C Jones, Thomas M Hitchcock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06362889 (An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Microneedling With Cannabidiol), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06362889 phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Microneedling With Cannabidiol (CBD) and Hempseed Oil for Treating Acne Vulgaris

TypeinterventionalSponsorRejuva Medical AestheticsRan2025 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsAcne Vulgaris (Disorder)ArmsMicroneedling with CBD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mona L AlqamCrown Laboratories Scientific Affairs Division Dallas Texas USA.
Brian C JonesCrown Laboratories Scientific Affairs Division Dallas Texas USA.
Thomas M HitchcockCrown Laboratories Chief Science Officer Dallas Texas USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acne is an inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that occurs primarily in adolescents. There is no current ideal treatment for acne vulgaris, as many mainstay prescription treatment modalities can compromise the skin microbiome or have deleterious health effects. Further research is needed to investigate novel treatment modalities that account for the importance of the skin microbiome. Other developing treatment modalities for acne are still taking a similar mode of action as current treatments by trying to eliminate Objectives: Test the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment modality for acne vulgaris. Methods: Subjects were split into two groups, one group received three treatments 4 weeks apart, and the second group received four treatments 2 weeks apart. Subjects received an acne assessment by an expert clinical grader at all clinical visits. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction in both non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions at the 2-month follow-up compared to the baseline for Group 1. Group 1 and Group 2 saw a decline of 48.20% and 54.00% in non-inflammatory lesions and 57.97% and 36.67% in inflammatory lesions, respectively, at their last visit compared to baseline. Conclusion: This study expands the utility of microneedling into a potential therapeutic modality for acne vulgaris. The data generated during the duration of this clinical study demonstrates that there is no scientific reason for microneedling to be contraindicated for acne. In this pilot, microneedling did not cause post-treatment complications and was seen to reduce acne lesions effectively. Thus, microneedling may have the potential to be a well-tolerated option for those suffering from acne, being a treatment that neither damages the sebaceous glands nor disrupts the skin microbiome.

Identifiers

PMID37799356
PMCPMC10549865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.