ArticleEJVES vascular forum2023
Natural Language Processing for Literature Search in Vascular Surgery: A Pilot Study Testing an Artificial Intelligence Based Application.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open E-survey on the Use and Perception of Chatbots in Vascular Surgery.EJVES vascular forum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of natural language processing (NLP) for a literature search has been poorly investigated in vascular surgery so far. The aim of this pilot study was to test the applicability of an artificial intelligence (AI) based mobile application for literature searching in a topic related to vascular surgery. Technique: A focused scientific question was defined to evaluate the performance of the AI application for a literature search and compare the results with the ground truth provided via a traditional literature search performed by human experts. Using pre-defined keywords, the literature search was performed automatically by the AI application through different steps, including quality assessment based on evaluation of the information available and quality filters using indicators of level of evidence, selection of publications based on relevancy filters using NLP, summarisation, and visualisation of the publications via the mobile app. A traditional literature search performed by human experts required 10 hours to check 154 original articles, among which 26 (16.9%) were truly related to the question, 63 (40.9%) related to the field but not to the specific question, and 65 (42.2%) were unrelated. The AI based search was performed in less than one hour, and, compared with traditional search, the method identified 17 original articles (48.6%) truly related to the question ( Discussion: The AI based method enabled a targeted, focused, and time saving literature search, although the selection of publications was not completely exhaustive. These results suggest that such an AI driven application is a complementary tool to help researchers and clinicians for continuous education and dissemination of knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.