ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023
Resistance patterns and transmission of mono- and polyresistant TB: clinical impact of WGS.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genotyping and transmission analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a pediatric population in Czech Republic and Slovakia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Rapidly diagnosing drug-resistant TB is crucial for improving treatment and transmission control. WGS is becoming increasingly accessible and has added value to the diagnosis and treatment of TB. The aim of the study was to perform WGS to determine the rate of false-positive results of phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and characterize the molecular mechanisms of resistance and transmission of mono- and polyresistant Methods: WGS was performed on 53 monoresistant and 25 polyresistant Results: The data showed the variable sensitivity and specificity of WGS in comparison with pDST as the gold standard: isoniazid 92.7% and 92.3%; streptomycin 41.9% and 100.0%; pyrazinamide 15% and 94.8%; and ethambutol 75.0% and 98.6%, respectively. We found novel mutations encoding resistance to streptomycin (in Conclusions: This study highlights the clinical potential of WGS in ruling out false-positive drug resistance following phenotypic or genetic drug testing, and recommend this technology together with the WHO catalogue in designing an optimal individualized treatment regimen and preventing the development of MDR TB. Our results suggest that resistance is primarily developed through spontaneous mutations or selective pressure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.