Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799225›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions in Removing Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Zinnie Nanda, Romalpreet Singh, Priyanka P Kamble, Gargi Deshmukh, Nileshrao Patil, Anshuman B Patil, Satyabrat Banerjee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zinnie NandaConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Romalpreet SinghConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College, Malout, IND.
Priyanka P KambleOral Pathology and Microbiology, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Gargi DeshmukhDental Surgery, Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's (CSMSS) Dental College and Hospital, Aurangabad, IND.
Nileshrao PatilConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Anshuman B PatilConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Satyabrat BanerjeeConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Rayat Shikshan Sanstha · INACPM Dental College and Hospital · INGovt. Dental College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of frequently used chemical agents in terms of their capacity to eliminate the smear layer after instrumentation, as observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and methods Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth, each with roots 15 mm in length, were used in this study. The teeth were divided into one control group and four study groups, each containing 12 teeth. In Control Group 0, teeth were irrigated with 3 ml of saline only. In Group 1, teeth were irrigated initially with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and then given a final rinse with 3 ml of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for one minute. In Group 2, teeth were irrigated with 3% NaOCl and given a final rinse with 3 ml of a mixture of tetracycline, acid, and detergent (MTAD, BIOPURE) for one minute. In Group 3, teeth were irrigated with saline and given a final rinse with 3 ml of 17% EDTA for one minute. In Group 4, teeth were irrigated with saline and given a final rinse with 3 ml of MTAD for one minute. One-half of each tooth was chosen and prepared for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds. These were observed at magnifications of up to 1,000 times to check for the presence or absence of a smear layer. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn's test. Results All of the root canal irrigation protocols exhibited superior efficacy compared to the control group in the elimination of the smear layer. Group 2 (3% NaOCl with MTAD) showed the lowest mean scores, compared to all the groups, followed by Group 1 (3% NaOCl with 17% EDTA). MTAD was more effective than EDTA. The smear layer was effectively removed from the apical third, followed by the middle and coronal thirds of the root. Conclusion Initial irrigation with 3% NaOCl and one-minute final irrigation with 3 ml MTAD was the most effective root irrigant, and particularly indicated in teeth with infection of the apical third.

Indexed as

ethylene diamine tetraacetic acidroot canal irrigantsscanning electron microscopysmear layersodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID37799225
PMCPMC10548495
OpenAlexW4386418814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.