Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799219›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Treatment Options for Faecolith (Stercoral) Obstruction of the Colon in Two Similar Cases.

Philip Holcroft, Faith Solanke, Sana Ullah, Mamoon Solkar, Pardeep Arora

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip HolcroftGeneral Surgery, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Faith SolankeGeneral Surgery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, GBR.
Sana UllahGeneral Surgery, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Mamoon SolkarGeneral Surgery, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Pardeep AroraGeneral Surgery, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Tameside Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A woman and man in their 20s presented to the accident and emergency (A&E) department with abdominal pain, vomiting, and absolute constipation. They both presented as atypical candidates for faecal impaction with few medical and lifestyle risk factors. On CT imaging, a faecolith was visualised in the sigmoid colon as a cause of the large bowel obstruction (LBO) in both patients. A faecolith obstruction can be a life-threatening sequela of faecal impaction. The first line of treatment for LBO is conservative management with oral laxatives and enemas. If this is unsuccessful, interventions such as flexible sigmoidoscopy with the placement of enemas above the blockage can be used. In the event of a compromise to bowel vascularity or if previous interventions prove unsuccessful, there is also scope for surgery. After the resolution of the blockage, follow-up investigations should be performed to elicit an underlying cause in the hope of preventing a recurrence.

Indexed as

colon obstructionemergency laparotomyfaecolithfecal disimpactionflexible sigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37799219
PMCPMC10550008
OpenAlexW4386415829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.