Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799215›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Artificial Intelligence Among Dentists and Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.

Gnanambigai Kalaimani, Sivapathasundharam B, Rajeswari M Chockalingam, Prem Karthick

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating Dental Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Large Language Models in Education in Saudi Arabia.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gnanambigai KalaimaniOral Pathology, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Sivapathasundharam BOral Pathology and Microbiology, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Rajeswari M ChockalingamOral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Prem KarthickOral Pathology, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Ragas Dental College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is the process by which it is possible to program computers to mimic human thoughts. AI and its subsets machine learning and deep learning have been developed to analyze complicated data gathered from many sources using algorithms built into decision support systems. It has been widely used in the field of dentistry.

aimThe study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of AI among dental students and dentists. METHODOLOGY: The present study is a descriptive cross-sectional online survey that was carried out among dentists and dental students in South India. A self-structured, close-ended questionnaire that was administered that consisted of 25 questions was included. The questions were circulated through Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States), and it was circulated among the study participants through online mode. The data were collected systematically, and SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used for data analysis.

resultsOne thousand (595 dental surgeons and 405 dental students) participated in the study through Google Forms. Among these, 700 (70%) were females and 300 (30%) were males. In the study group, 635 (63.5%) were aware of AI, and 365 (36.5%) were not aware (p-value 0.000). Among the 21 questions used to assess the KAP, 14 questions were significant with a p-value less than 0.05. More than 60% agreed that the dental curriculum has to be updated with AI. About 269 (26.9%) agreed that AI will replace the role of dentists in the future. There were no significant results in comparing dental surgeons and dental students.

conclusionThe present study showed that the KAP among dental surgeons and dental students was the same. They believe that the dental curriculum has to be updated with AI. This study shows that there is a lack of knowledge about deep learning models and websites used for AI among dentists. Thus, it is necessary to include evidence-based teaching and training about the application of AI in dental practice to improve the future of dentistry.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdental curriculumdental studentsdental surgeonsresearch

Identifiers

PMID37799215
PMCPMC10549783
OpenAlexW4386423302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.