Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799211›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age.

Nfn Kiran, Fnu Sapna, Fnu Kiran, Deepak Kumar, Fnu Raja, Sheena Shiwlani, Antonella Paladini, Fnu Sonam, Ahmed Bendari, Raja Sandeep Perkash and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Digital neuropathology of neurodegenerative disorders: Foundations, research advances, and future directions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nfn KiranPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, New York, USA.
Fnu SapnaPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
Fnu KiranPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA.
Deepak KumarPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Fnu RajaPathology and Laboratory Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.
Sheena ShiwlaniPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Isra University, Karachi, PAK.
Antonella PaladiniClinical Medicine, Public Health and Life Science (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA.
Fnu SonamPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Sukkur, PAK.
Ahmed BendariPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, USA.
Raja Sandeep PerkashNeurosurgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
Fnu AnjaliInternal Medicine, Sakhi Baba General Hospital, Sukkur, PAK.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of rapid technological advancements, the narrative review titled "Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age" explores the significant impact of digital pathology in reshaping diagnostic approaches. This review delves into the various effects of the field, including remote consultations and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, revealing the ongoing transformation taking place. The investigation explores the process of digitizing traditional glass slides, which aims to improve accessibility and facilitate sharing. Additionally, it addresses the complexities associated with data security and standardization challenges. Incorporating AI enhances pathologists' diagnostic capabilities and accelerates analytical procedures. Furthermore, the review highlights the growing importance of collaborative networks facilitating global knowledge sharing. It also emphasizes the significant impact of this technology on medical education and patient care. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of digital pathology's transformative and innovative potential, highlighting its disruptive nature in reshaping diagnostic practices.

Indexed as

ai and robotics in healthcareai-assistedai & robotics in healthcareanalysisdiagnosisdigitalpathology

Identifiers

PMID37799211
PMCPMC10547926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.