Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Predictors of well-being, future anxiety, and multiple recurrent health complaints among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of socioeconomic determinants, sense of coherence, and digital health literacy. An Italian cross-sectional study.

Chiara Lorini, Giuseppe Cavallo, Virginia Vettori, Primo Buscemi, Giulia Ciardi, Patrizio Zanobini, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski, Vieri Lastrucci, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sociodemographic factors and their predictive role in parents' future anxiety.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara LoriniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe CavalloDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Virginia VettoriDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Primo BuscemiSchool of Specialization in Public Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia CiardiSchool of Specialization in Public Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Patrizio ZanobiniDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Orkan OkanDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Uptown München-Campus D, Munich, Germany.
Kevin DadaczynskiDepartment of Health Science, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Vieri LastrucciDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Guglielmo BonaccorsiDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITFulda University of Applied Sciences · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic deeply changed young adults' life. Lockdown period and the social restrictions dramatically affected university students' mental health. The aim of our cross-sectional study was to describe psychological well-being, future anxiety (FA), and health complaints (HCs) in a sample of 3,001 students of the University of Florence in the middle of the first two pandemic waves. We assessed the role of subjective social status, chronic diseases, sense of coherence (SoC), and digital health literacy (DHL) as predictors of psychological well-being, FA, and HCs. Students expressed high levels of FA and reported being disturbed by not being able to achieve their desired future goals. About 40% reported a low or a very low well-being and 19.1% experienced two or more subjective health complaints more than once a week. The likelihood of having a better mental health status significantly increased with increasing SoC and among males. Subjective Social Status proved to be a predictor for FA. Enhancing SoC could improve the health status of the university students during the pandemic and beyond.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracySense of CoherenceAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePandemicsSocioeconomic FactorsStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adultcross-sectional studypsychological determinantsSOCsocioeconomic determinantsuniversity studentswell-being

Identifiers

PMID37799148
PMCPMC10548390
OpenAlexW4386930786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.