ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2023
The application of 3D brachytherapy in cervical stump cancer: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cervical stump cancer is a carcinoma that grows on the cervical stump after a sub-total hysterectomy. There have been no studies on the application of 3D brachytherapy in cervical stump cancer. In the present study, we aimed to compare the curative effects, toxicity, and dosimetry of 3D and 2D brachytherapy in cervical stump cancer. Material and methods: Thirty-one patients admitted between 2012 and 2021, who were concurrently treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy for cervical stump cancer were divided into three groups according to the brachytherapy techniques: 2D brachytherapy, 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), and 2D + 3D. For patients undergoing 2D brachytherapy and 3D-IGBT, data on survival, complications, and dose to target area or organs at risk (OARs) were collected and compared. Furthermore, dosimetry difference was investigated by reconstructing the 2D plan into a 3D plan. Results: The median follow-up duration of all patients was 58 months. The overall 5-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and local control rates were 69.6%, 90.2%, and 78.2%, respectively. Late complications in the rectum, sigmoid colon, and bladder were milder in 3D brachytherapy than in 2D brachytherapy. Concerning the D Conclusions: Despite lacking statistical significance, 3D brachytherapy showed better outcomes regarding late toxicity than 2D brachytherapy, owing to the lower dose coverage in the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small intestine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.