Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799115›Full record

ArticleResearch Evaluation2023

Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation.

James M Bowen, Mathieu Ouimet, Justin Lawarée, Joanna Bielecki, Ashley Rhéaume, Caylee Greenberg, Valeria E Rac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research Evaluation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James M BowenProgram for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-2337
Mathieu OuimetHealth Technology Assessment and Network Analytics, Diabetes Action Canada, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4,Canada.
Justin LawaréeDépartement de Science Politique, Faculté des Science Social, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Joanna BieleckiProgram for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Ashley RhéaumeDépartement de Science Politique, Faculté des Science Social, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Caylee GreenbergProgram for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-3200
Valeria E RacProgram for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-4594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors.

Indexed as

network evaluationpatient engagementpayback modelresearch impact assessmentreturn on investmentsocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID37799115
PMCPMC10550251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.