Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37799004›Full record

ArticleBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2024

The association between preterm births and assisted reproductive technologies.

Anna Stastna, Eva Waldaufova, Tomas Fait

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna StastnaDepartment of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Eva WaldaufovaDepartment of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Tomas FaitDepartment of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Charles University · CZCollege of Polytechnics Jihlava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study is to determine whether the risk of preterm births differs according to the conception method: with or without ART and according to the ART method used (in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer (FET) and oocyte receipt (OoR)).

methodsThe research is based on individualised anonymised data on deliveries in Czechia in 2013-2018 (n=651,049) obtained from the National Health Information System. We employ the survival analysis approach applying survival functions (Life tables method) and Cox regression to model the risk of preterm births according to the conception method when controlling for a set of covariates.

resultsThe results revealed that the risk of preterm births in singleton pregnancies is higher for ART-treated women (1.56 to 2.06 depending on the ART method) than for non-ART-treated women. The proportion of preterm births differs according to the ART method; the highest proportion was observed for OoR mothers.

conclusionsOverall, the differences between ART-treated mothers according to the conception method are due mainly to the structural differences between mothers. When controlling for the covariates (Cox regression model), no significant differences were observed concerning the risk of preterm births for women who underwent fresh IVF, FET and OoR.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferFertilization in VitroOocyte DonationPremature BirthAdultCzech RepublicFemaleHumansIncidencePregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsYoung Adultassisted reproduction technologyfrozen embryo transferin-vitro fertilisationoocyte donationpreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID37799004
OpenAlexW4387366118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.