Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798954›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2024

Validation of a short food group questionnaire to determine intakes from healthy and unhealthy food groups in 5-9-year-old South African children.

H Salome Kruger, Persuade Makore, Tertia van Zyl, Mieke Faber, Lisa J Ware, Makama A Monyeki, Ruan Kruger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A prospective analysis to assess the multifactorial risk of childhood-onset hypertension: the ExAMIN Youth SA study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Validation of a short food group questionnaire to determine intakes from healthy and unhealthy food groups in 5-9-year-old South African children.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H Salome KrugerCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-1777
Persuade MakoreCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Tertia van ZylCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Mieke FaberCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Lisa J WareSA MRC-Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-4017
Makama A MonyekiPhysical Activity, Sport and Recreation Research Focus Area, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-8394
Ruan KrugerMedical Research Council Research Unit for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Funding

SA MRC under a Self-Initiated Research Grant and the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Innovation and NRF of South Africa 86895South African Medical Research Council (SA MRC) Extra Mural Unit and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa for Competitive Support for Y-Rated Researchers 112141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable dietary data for children are necessary to investigate associations with health outcomes. The present study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to determine the frequency of intakes of specific healthy and unhealthy food groups in young children.

methodsParticipants were 5-9-year-old South African children (n = 920) from 10 urban schools. Their parents completed a demographic questionnaire and the food intake questionnaire with food pictures. Based on the literature, four healthy food groups (fruits, vegetables, milk, meat/fish/poultry/eggs) and six unhealthy food groups (hot and cold sugar-sweetened beverages, candy, salty snacks, cakes and fast foods) were included, with five different frequency responses. Six experienced nutritionists assessed the face validity and content validity. After pilot testing, construct validity and homogeneity were determined in the participants. Convergent validity was determined using urinary sodium and potassium concentrations as biological intake markers.

resultsNutritionists confirmed face and content validity. Caregivers confirmed understanding of the questionnaire. Three factors explained 50.2% of the variance, with most unhealthy food groups as factor 1, fruits and vegetables as factor 2, and animal source protein and milk groups clustered with sugar-sweetened beverages as factor 3. The frequency of milk group, fruits and vegetables intake correlated negatively, whereas the frequency of salty snacks and fast foods intakes correlated positively with the urinary sodium:potassium ratio.

conclusionsThe healthy and unhealthy food group questionnaire has advantages of low respondent burden, as well as acceptable content and convergent validity in South African children. The questionnaire may be used to investigate associations between food intakes and health outcomes.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFeeding BehaviorHumansPotassiumSodiumSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesPotassiumSodiumdietary intakehealthy foodsquestionnaireunhealthy foods

Identifiers

PMID37798954
PMCPMC10953415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.