Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798802›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2023

PsyCARE study: assessing impact, cost-effectiveness, and transdiagnostic factors of the Italian ministry of health's "psychological bonus" policy.

Ilaria M A Benzi, Angelo Compare, Antonino La Tona, Santo Di Nuovo, David Lazzari, Vittorio Lingiardi, Gianluca Lo Coco, Laura Parolin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria M A BenziDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Angelo CompareDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Antonino La TonaDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Santo Di NuovoDepartment of Science of Education, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
David LazzariNational Board of Italian Psychologists (CNOP), Rome, Italy.
Vittorio LingiardiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca Lo CocoDepartment of Psychology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Laura ParolinNational Board of Italian Psychologists (CNOP), Rome, Italy. laura.parolin@unimib.it.
University of Bergamo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders is surging worldwide, prompting a pressing demand for psychological interventions, especially in less severe cases. Responding to this need, the Italian government implemented the "Psychological Bonus" (PB) policy, allotting 25 million euros for mental health support. This policy entitles individuals to a minimum of four to twelve psychological sessions. In collaboration with the National Board of Italian Psychologists, our study assesses this policy's effectiveness. Indeed, the PsyCARE study aims to examine the utilization of the Psychological Bonus, evaluate its impact on adult and adolescent participants' psychological well-being through pre- and post-intervention assessments and six-month follow-up, and conduct a longitudinal cost-effectiveness analysis of this policy. A secondary aim is to investigate the influence of these interventions on transdiagnostic factors, including emotion regulation and epistemic trust.

methodsThe study involves licensed psychotherapists and their patients, both adults and adolescents, benefiting from the Psychological Bonus. Data collection is underway and set to conclude in December 2023. Psychotherapists will provide diagnostic information and assess patient functioning. In addition, patients will be evaluated on mental health aspects such as clinical symptoms, emotion regulation, epistemic trust, and quality of life. We will employ linear mixed-effects models to analyze the outcomes, accounting for both fixed and random effects to capture the hierarchical structure of the data. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the study's findings will highlight reduced psychological distress and improved quality of life for participants and demonstrate the Psychological Bonus policy's cost-effectiveness. The study will gather data on the role of specific versus nonspecific therapeutic factors in psychotherapy while adopting a patient-tailored approach to identify effective therapeutic elements and examine transdiagnostic factors. Overall, this study's findings will guide future measures within the Italian healthcare system, fostering a psychological health culture and providing valuable insights to the broader public. STUDY REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/6zk2j.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansAnxietyDepressionEffectivenessEmotion regulationEpistemic trustMental healthPsyCAREPsychological interventionPsychotherapyTransdiagnostic factors

Identifiers

PMID37798802
PMCPMC10557166
OpenAlexW4387375771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.