Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798675›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2023

The AnimalAssociatedMetagenomeDB reveals a bias towards livestock and developed countries and blind spots in functional-potential studies of animal-associated microbiomes.

Anderson Paulo Avila Santos, Muhammad Kabiru Nata'ala, Jonas Coelho Kasmanas, Alexander Bartholomäus, Tina Keller-Costa, Stephanie D Jurburg, Tamara Tal, Amélia Camarinha-Silva, João Pedro Saraiva, André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira de Carvalho and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fecal Material of Captive Wild Animals as Source of CAZymes With Application Potential.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. SCiMS: Sex Calling in Metagenomic Sequences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Human microbiome acquisition and transmission.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anderson Paulo Avila SantosDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Muhammad Kabiru Nata'alaDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Jonas Coelho KasmanasDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander BartholomäusGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 3.7 Geomicrobiology, 14473, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.
Tina Keller-CostaInstitute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Tecnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, 1049-001, Portugal.
Stephanie D JurburgDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Tamara TalDepartment of Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Amélia Camarinha-SilvaHohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research (HoLMiR), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
João Pedro SaraivaDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira de CarvalhoInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, Brazil.
Peter F StadlerDepartment of Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Centre of Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Danilo Sipoli SanchesFederal Univ. of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Cornélio Procópio, Brazil.
Ulisses RochaDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ GmbH, 04318, Leipzig, Germany. ulisses.rocha@ufz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetagenomic data can shed light on animal-microbiome relationships and the functional potential of these communities. Over the past years, the generation of metagenomics data has increased exponentially, and so has the availability and reusability of data present in public repositories. However, identifying which datasets and associated metadata are available is not straightforward. We created the Animal-Associated Metagenome Metadata Database (AnimalAssociatedMetagenomeDB - AAMDB) to facilitate the identification and reuse of publicly available non-human, animal-associated metagenomic data, and metadata. Further, we used the AAMDB to (i) annotate common and scientific names of the species; (ii) determine the fraction of vertebrates and invertebrates; (iii) study their biogeography; and (iv) specify whether the animals were wild, pets, livestock or used for medical research.

resultsWe manually selected metagenomes associated with non-human animals from SRA and MG-RAST.  Next, we standardized and curated 51 metadata attributes (e.g., host, compartment, geographic coordinates, and country). The AAMDB version 1.0 contains 10,885 metagenomes associated with 165 different species from 65 different countries. From the collected metagenomes, 51.1% were recovered from animals associated with medical research or grown for human consumption (i.e., mice, rats, cattle, pigs, and poultry). Further, we observed an over-representation of animals collected in temperate regions (89.2%) and a lower representation of samples from the polar zones, with only 11 samples in total. The most common genus among invertebrate animals was Trichocerca (rotifers).

conclusionOur work may guide host species selection in novel animal-associated metagenome research, especially in biodiversity and conservation studies. The data available in our database will allow scientists to perform meta-analyses and test new hypotheses (e.g., host-specificity, strain heterogeneity, and biogeography of animal-associated metagenomes), leveraging existing data. The AAMDB WebApp is a user-friendly interface that is publicly available at https://webapp.ufz.de/aamdb/ .

Indexed as

Animal-Associated MicrobiomesDatabaseFAIR principlesMetadataMetagenomeMicrobial Ecology

Identifiers

PMID37798675
PMCPMC10552293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.