Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798626›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Assessment of micromotion at the bone-bone interface after coracoid and scapular-spine bone-block augmentation for the reconstruction of critical anterior glenoid bone loss-a biomechanical cadaver study.

Yasmin Youssef, Martin Heilemann, Peter Melcher, Jean-Pierre Fischer, Stefan Schleifenbaum, Pierre Hepp, Jan Theopold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasmin Youssef *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. yasmin.youssef@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Martin Heilemann *ZESBO-Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Peter MelcherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Jean-Pierre FischerZESBO-Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan SchleifenbaumZESBO-Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Pierre HeppDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Jan TheopoldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlenoid bone loss is among the most important risk factors for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, and a bony reconstruction is recommended in cases of critical bone loss (> 15%). The commonly used surgical techniques, including coracoid transfer, are associated with considerable complications. The aim of this study was to assess the motion at the glenoid-bone-block interface after coracoid and spina-scapula bone-block reconstruction of the anterior glenoid.

methodsTwelve cadaveric shoulders were tested. A 20% bone defect of the anterior glenoid was created, and the specimens were randomly assigned for glenoid augmentation using a coracoid bone block (n = 6) or a scapular spine bone block (n = 6). The glenoid-bone interface was cyclically loaded for 5000 cycles with a force of 170 N. The micromotion was tracked using an optical measurement system (GOM ARMIS) and was evaluated with the GOM Correlate Pro software.

resultsThe most dominant motion component was medial irreversible displacement for the spina-scapula (1.87 mm; SD: 1.11 mm) and coracoid bone blocks (0.91 mm; SD: 0.29 mm) (n.s.). The most medial irreversible displacement took place during the first nine cycles. The inferior reversible displacement was significantly greater for spina-scapula bone blocks (0.28 mm, SD: 0.16 mm) compared to coracoid bone blocks (0.06 mm, SD: 0.10 mm) (p = 0.02).

conclusionsThe medial irreversible displacement is the dominant motion component in a bone-block reconstruction after a critical bone loss of the anterior glenoid. The spina-scapula and coracoid bone blocks are comparable in terms of primary stability and extent of motion. Thus, spina-scapula bone blocks may serve as alternatives in bony glenoid reconstruction from a biomechanical point of view.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityShoulder JointBone TransplantationCadaverHumansScapulaBone-block augmentationGlenoidMicromotionPrimary stabilitySpina-scapula bone block

Identifiers

PMID37798626
PMCPMC10552292
OpenAlexW4387373929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.