Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798591›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024

Predicting the risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics.

Minling Zhuo, Yi Tang, Jingjing Guo, Qingfu Qian, Ensheng Xue, Zhikui Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minling Zhuo *Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Yi Tang *Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Jingjing Guo *Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Qingfu QianDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Ensheng XueDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Zhikui ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China. jimchen2003@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-9641

Funding

Fujian Provincial Finance Department 2019-WJ-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to use conventional ultrasound features, ultrasound radiomics, and machine learning algorithms to establish a predictive model to assess the risk of post-surgical recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 230 patients with pathologically diagnosed GISTs. Radiomic features were extracted from manually annotated images. Radiomic features plus conventional ultrasound features were selected using the SelectKbest analysis of variance and stratified tenfold cross-validation recursive elimination methods. Finally, five different machine learning algorithms (logistic regression [LR], support vector machine [SVM], random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], and multilayer perceptron [MLP]) were established to predict risk stratification of GISTs. The predictive performance of the established model was mainly evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy, whereas the predictive performance of the optimal machine learning algorithm and a radiologist's subjective assessment were compared using McNemar's test.

resultsSeven radiomics features and one conventional ultrasound feature were selected to construct the machine learning models for GIST risk classification. The mentioned five machine learning models were able to predict the malignant potential of GISTs. LR and SVM outperformed other classifiers on the test set, with LR achieving an accuracy of 0.852 (AUC, 0.881; sensitivity, 0.871; specificity, 0.826) and SVM achieving an accuracy of 0.852 (AUC, 0.879; sensitivity, 0.839; specificity, 0.870), and proved significantly better than the radiologist (accuracy, 0.691; sensitivity, 0.645; specificity, 0.813).

conclusionMachine learning-based ultrasound radiomics features are able to noninvasively predict the biological risk of GISTs.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMachine LearningRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGastrointestinal stromal tumorMachine learningRadiomicsRisk classificationUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.