Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798426›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2024

Training and learning ultrasound: survey on a sample of Italian students, impact and role inside the core curriculum of degree courses in medicine and surgery.

Andrea Boccatonda, Antonio Ursitti, Alessio Frisone, Patrizio D'Alessandro, Maria Teresa Guagnano, Giovanni Iannetti, Cosima Schiavone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea BoccatondaInternal Medicine, Bentivoglio Hospital, AUSL Bologna, 40010, Bentivoglio, Italy. andrea.boccatonda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-7790
Antonio UrsittiInternistic Ultrasound Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Alessio FrisoneDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Patrizio D'AlessandroInternistic Ultrasound Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Teresa GuagnanoDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Giovanni IannettiOspedale S. Spirito, Università Degli Studi Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Cosima SchiavoneInternistic Ultrasound Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltrasound is essential in the clinical practice of many medical specialties due to non-invasiveness, rapidity of examination, low costs and simplicity. Many specialized companies and universities pointed out its potential as a teaching tool for medical students. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of an ultrasound course on a sample of students attending the fourth, fifth and sixth year of the degree course in Medicine, highlighting changing in satisfaction and preparation. Another target is to verify the capability of a course on ultrasound to positively impact on participants knowledge and competences.

methodsStudents attending 6 training courses of Medicine held between 2017 and 2019 were recruited. Five trainings held during an Italian society of ultrasound in medicine and biology (SIUMB) congress, in a session dedicated to students, and one during an elective didactic activity (ADE) held in Chieti University. A questionnaire was given to the students before and after the course, in order to assess the impact of the course on the motivation and knowledge. Moreover, a test was also administered at the end of the theoretical part, with questions relating to the notions learned.

resultsThere was an 81% of correct response to the learning questionnaire by calculating the mean of 5 SIUMB courses performed. The students are strongly motivated to continue learning ultrasound already from the beginning of the course, and this result remains unchanged in the questionnaire administered at the end. The interest of students towards this method is high, and they would ultrasound courses within the Medicine degree, even before participating in the training. It was evident how students positively assessed the course in relation to the acquisition of skills and knowledge, albeit with a tendency to acquire more knowledge rather than skills.

conclusionsOur data support the usefulness of including ultrasound into the curriculum of medical students and on its use as a teaching tool. Students are highly motivated and perceive a significant improvement in both skills and knowledge following the proposed courses. Hands-on part is necessary in the training course on ultrasonography.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudents, MedicalUltrasonographyAdultClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansItalyLearningMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonicsYoung AdultLearningMedicineTrainingUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37798426
PMCPMC11496470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.