ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFR
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Diagnosis and Revascularization Guidance of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Improved diagnostic performance of CT-derived FFR using 70-keV monoenergetic spectral CT in coronary artery disease.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Digital twins and simulations in transcatheter coronary and structural heart interventions.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Rationale and Design of the "PRECISION-CT" Study-A Prospective Evaluation of Coronary CTA Integration for Strategy Improvement and Optimization of PCI in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A computational model of coronary arteries with in-stent restenosis coupling hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics with growth mechanics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Expert Opinion from a SCAI/SCCT Roundtable.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- A Review of Factors Affecting Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Coronary CTA Performed with Wide-Detector CT.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Management of Coronary Artery Diseases in Systemic Vasculitides: Complications and Strategies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Impact of nitroglycerin on machine-learning fractional flow reserve in coronary computed tomography (CT)-angiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of a virtual stenting tool based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from CCTA (FFR MATERIALS AND
methodsProspective, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80. All patients underwent CCTA performed with recent-generation scanners. CCTA image quality was adjudicated using the four-point Likert scale at a per-vessel level by an independent committee blinded to the FFR
resultsOverall, 120 patients (123 vessels) were included. Invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.88 ± 0.06 and Planner FFR
conclusionThe FFR CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Being accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR across a wide spectrum of CT image quality, the FFR KEY POINTS: • The fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
37798406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.