Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A pilot study of implication of machine learning for relapse prediction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Kseniia S Afanaseva, Evgeny A Bakin, Anna G Smirnova, Ildar M Barkhatov, Tatiana L Gindina, Ivan S Moiseev, Sergey N Bondarenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kseniia S AfanasevaDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022. afanasevaksenya11@gmail.com.
Evgeny A BakinDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Anna G SmirnovaDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Ildar M BarkhatovDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Tatiana L GindinaDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Ivan S MoiseevDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Sergey N BondarenkoDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation of Adults, RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Lev Tolstoy Str., 6/8, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The posttransplant relapse in Ph-positive ALL increases the risk of death. There is an unmet need for instruments to predict the risk of relapse and plan prophylaxis. In this study, we analyzed posttransplant data by machine learning algorithms. Seventy-four Ph-positive ALL patients with a median age of 30 (range 18-55) years who previously underwent allo-HSCT, were retrospectively enrolled. Ninety-three percent of patients received prophylactic/preemptive TKIs after allo-HSCT. The values of the BCR::ABL1 level at serial assessments and over variables were collected in specified intervals after allo-HSCT. They were used to model relapse risk with several machine-learning approaches. GBM proved superior to the other algorithms and provided a maximal AUC score of 0.91. BCR::ABL1 level before and after allo-HSCT, prediction moment, and chronic GvHD had the highest value in the model. It was shown that after Day + 100, both error rates do not exceed 22%, while before D + 100, the model fails to make accurate predictions. As a result, we determined BCR::ABL1 levels at which the relapse risk remains low. Thus, the current BCR::ABL1 level less than 0.06% in patients with chronic GvHD predicts low risk of relapse. At the same time, patients without chronic GVHD after allo-HSCT should be classified as high risk with any level of BCR::ABL1. GBM model with posttransplant laboratory values of BCR::ABL1 provides a high prediction of relapse after allo-HSCT in the era of TKIs prophylaxis. Validation of this approach is warranted.

Indexed as

Bronchiolitis Obliterans SyndromeHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37798335
PMCPMC10556079
OpenAlexW4387376268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.