Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798294›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A molecular staging model for accurately dating the endometrial biopsy.

W T Teh, J Chung, S J Holdsworth-Carson, J F Donoghue, M Healey, H C Rees, S Bittinger, V Obers, C Sloggett, R Kendarsari and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endometriosis and adenomyosis unveiled through single-cell glasses.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Role of the Endometrium in Implantation: A Modern View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

W T Teh *University of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9808-1141
J Chung *University of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
S J Holdsworth-CarsonUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J F DonoghueUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
M HealeyUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
H C ReesRoyal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
S BittingerRoyal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
V ObersMelbourne Pathology, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
C SloggettMelbourne Bioinformatics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
R KendarsariInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
J N FungSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
S MortlockInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2327-9465
G W MontgomeryInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-8139
J E GirlingUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8154-2068
P A W RogersUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. parogers@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-8997
Royal Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Melbourne · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural variability in menstrual cycle length, coupled with rapid changes in endometrial gene expression, makes it difficult to accurately define and compare different stages of the endometrial cycle. Here we develop and validate a method for precisely determining endometrial cycle stage based on global gene expression. Our 'molecular staging model' reveals significant and remarkably synchronised daily changes in expression for over 3400 endometrial genes throughout the cycle, with the most dramatic changes occurring during the secretory phase. Our study significantly extends existing data on the endometrial transcriptome, and for the first time enables identification of differentially expressed endometrial genes with increasing age and different ethnicities. It also allows reinterpretation of all endometrial RNA-seq and array data that has been published to date. Our molecular staging model will significantly advance understanding of endometrial-related disorders that affect nearly all women at some stage of their lives, such as heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis, adenomyosis, and recurrent implantation failure.

Indexed as

EndometriumUterine DiseasesBiopsyFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37798294
PMCPMC10556104
OpenAlexW4387392491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.