Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37798129›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

The Representation of Observed Actions at the Subordinate, Basic, and Superordinate Level.

Tonghe Zhuang, Zuzanna Kabulska, Angelika Lingnau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tonghe ZhuangFaculty of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chair of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-4962
Zuzanna KabulskaFaculty of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chair of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Angelika LingnauFaculty of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chair of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany angelika.lingnau@ur.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8620-3009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actions can be planned and recognized at different hierarchical levels, ranging from very specific (e.g., to swim backstroke) to very broad (e.g., locomotion). Understanding the corresponding neural representation is an important prerequisite to reveal how our brain flexibly assigns meaning to the world around us. To address this question, we conducted an event-related fMRI study in male and female human participants in which we examined distinct representations of observed actions at the subordinate, basic and superordinate level. Using multiple regression representational similarity analysis (RSA) in predefined regions of interest, we found that the three different taxonomic levels were best captured by patterns of activations in bilateral lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC), showing the highest similarity with the basic level model. A whole-brain multiple regression RSA revealed that information unique to the basic level was captured by patterns of activation in dorsal and ventral portions of the LOTC and in parietal regions. By contrast, the unique information for the subordinate level was limited to bilateral occipitotemporal cortex, while no single cluster was obtained that captured unique information for the superordinate level. The behaviorally established action space was best captured by patterns of activation in the LOTC and superior parietal cortex, and the corresponding neural patterns of activation showed the highest similarity with patterns of activation corresponding to the basic level model. Together, our results suggest that occipitotemporal cortex shows a preference for the basic level model, with flexible access across the subordinate and the basic level.

Indexed as

Occipital LobeTemporal LobeBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePattern Recognition, Visualaction categorizationaction observationaction recognition

Identifiers

PMID37798129
PMCPMC10697398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.