Patients' and clinicians' views on the appropriate use of safety-netting advice in consultations-an interview study from Sweden.

backgroundA promising approach to manage clinical uncertainty and thereby reduce the risk of preventable diagnostic harm is to use safety-netting advice (ie, communicating structured information to patients about when and where to reconsult healthcare).

aimTo explore clinicians' and patients' views on when and how safety-netting can be successfully applied in primary-care and emergency-care settings. DESIGN AND

settingAn exploratory qualitative research design; we performed focus groups and interviews in a Swedish setting.

participantsNine physicians working in primary or emergency care and eight patients or caregivers participated. The participants were an ethnically homogeneous group, originating from Western European or Australian backgrounds.

methodData were analysed inductively, using the framework method. The results are reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines for reporting qualitative research.

resultsIn order to manage diagnostic uncertainty using safety-netting, clinicians and patients emphasised the need to understand the

conclusionThe establishment of a shared mental model between clinician and patient of the preconditions for the clinical encounter is a vital factor affecting how safety-netting advice is communicated and received and its ability to support patients in problem detection and planning after the visit. We suggest that successful safety-netting can be viewed as a team activity, where the clinician and patient collaborate in monitoring how the patient's condition progresses after the care visit. Furthermore, our findings suggest that to be successfully implemented, safety-netting advice needs to be tailored to the clinical context in general and to the patient-clinician encounter in particular.