Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37797370›Full record

ArticleRedox biology2023

The Arabidopsis thioredoxin TRXh5regulates the S-nitrosylation pattern of the TIRK receptor being both proteins essential in the modulation of defences to Tetranychus urticae.

Ana Arnaiz, Maria C Romero-Puertas, M Estrella Santamaria, Irene Rosa-Diaz, Vicent Arbona, Alfonso Muñoz, Vojislava Grbic, Pablo González-Melendi, M Mar Castellano, Luisa Maria Sandalio and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Redox biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Members of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana ArnaizCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: a.arnaiz@upm.es.
Maria C Romero-PuertasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology of Plants, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Granada, Spain. Electronic address: maria.romero@eez.csic.es.
M Estrella SantamariaCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: me.santamaria@upm.es.
Irene Rosa-DiazCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: i.rosa@upm.es.
Vicent ArbonaDepartament de Biologia, Bioquímica i Ciències Naturals, Universitat Jaume I, E-12071, Castelló de la Plana, Spain. Electronic address: vicente.arbona@camn.uji.es.
Alfonso MuñozDepartamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, UPM, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: alfonso.munozg@upm.es.
Vojislava GrbicDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, N6A 5BT, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: vgrbic@uwo.ca.
Pablo González-MelendiCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, UPM, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: pablo.melendi@upm.es.
M Mar CastellanoCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: castellano.mar@inia.csic.es.
Luisa Maria SandalioDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology of Plants, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Granada, Spain. Electronic address: luisamaria.sandalio@eez.csic.es.
Manuel MartinezCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, UPM, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: m.martinez@upm.es.
Isabel DiazCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/CSIC, Campus de Montegancedo, 20223, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, UPM, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: i.diaz@upm.es.
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESEstación Experimental del Zaidín · ESTécnicas y Servicios de Ingeniería (Spain) · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ESWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between plants and phytophagous arthropods encompasses a complex network of molecules, signals, and pathways to overcome defences generated by each interacting organism. Although most of the elements and modulators involved in this interplay are still unidentified, plant redox homeostasis and signalling are essential for the establishment of defence responses. Here, focusing on the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, we demonstrate the involvement in plant defence of the thioredoxin TRXh5, a small redox protein whose expression is induced by mite infestation. TRXh5 is localized in the cell membrane system and cytoplasm and is associated with alterations in the content of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Protein S-nitrosylation signal in TRXh5 over-expression lines is decreased and alteration in TRXh5 level produces changes in the JA/SA hormonal crosstalk of infested plants. Moreover, TRXh5 interacts and likely regulates the redox state of an uncharacterized receptor-like kinase, named THIOREDOXIN INTERACTING RECEPTOR KINASE (TIRK), also induced by mite herbivory. Feeding bioassays performed withTRXh5 over-expression plants result in lower leaf damage and reduced egg accumulation after T. urticae infestation than in wild-type (WT) plants. In contrast, mites cause a more severe injury in trxh5 mutant lines where a greater number of eggs accumulates. Likewise, analysis of TIRK-gain and -loss-of-function lines demonstrate the defence role of this receptor in Arabidopsis against T. urticae. Altogether, our findings demonstrate the interaction between TRXh5 and TIRK and highlight the importance of TRXh5 and TIRK in the establishment of effective Arabidopsis defences against spider mite herbivory.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisTetranychidaeAnimalsHomeostasisPlantsThioredoxinsThioredoxins

Identifiers

PMID37797370
PMCPMC10622877
OpenAlexW4387095536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.