ArticlePloS one2023
Development of an image processing software for quantification of histological calcification staining images.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteogenic Activity and Bone Matrix Mineralization Induced byFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Optimizing graphene-enhanced polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantification of the histological staining images gives important insights in biomedical research. In wet lab, it is common to have some stains off the target to become unwanted noisy stains during the generation of histological staining images. The current tools designed for quantification of histological staining images do not consider such situations; instead, the stained region is identified based on assumptions that the background is pure and clean. The goal of this study is to develop a light software named Staining Quantification (SQ) tool which could handle the image quantification job with features for removing a large amount of unwanted stains blended or overlaid with Region of Interest (ROI) in complex scenarios. The core algorithm was based on the method of higher order statistics transformation, and local density filtering. Compared with two state-of-art thresholding methods (i.e. Otsu's method and Triclass thresholding method), the SQ tool outperformed in situations such as (1) images with weak positive signals and experimental caused dirty stains; (2) images with experimental counterstaining by multiple colors; (3) complicated histological structure of target tissues. The algorithm was developed in R4.0.2 with over a thousand in-house histological images containing Alizarin Red (AR) and Von Kossa (VK) staining, and was validated using external images. For the measurements of area and intensity in total and stained region, the average mean of difference in percentage between SQ and ImageJ were all less than 0.05. Using this as a criterion of successful image recognition, the success rate for all measurements in AR, VK and external validation batch were above 0.8. The test of Pearson's coefficient, difference between SQ and ImageJ, and difference of proportions between SQ and ImageJ were all significant at level of 0.05. Our results indicated that the SQ tool is well established for automatic histological staining image quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.