Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37797036›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2023

Deep-time paleogenomics and the limits of DNA survival.

Love Dalén, Peter D Heintzman, Joshua D Kapp, Beth Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ancient DNA from shells reveals delayed genomic erosion and rapid immune adaptation in the critically endangered black abalone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Million Years of Mammoth Mitogenome Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Love DalénCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8270-7613
Peter D HeintzmanCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6449-0219
Joshua D KappDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-3657
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-7776

Funding

European Research Council 101054984Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most ancient DNA studies have focused on the last 50,000 years, paleogenomic approaches can now reach into the early Pleistocene, an epoch of repeated environmental changes that shaped present-day biodiversity. Emerging deep-time genomic transects, including from DNA preserved in sediments, will enable inference of adaptive evolution, discovery of unrecognized species, and exploration of how glaciations, volcanism, and paleomagnetic reversals shaped demography and community composition. In this Review, we explore the state-of-the-art in paleogenomics and discuss key challenges, including technical limitations, evolutionary divergence and associated biases, and the need for more precise dating of remains and sediments. We conclude that with improvements in laboratory and computational methods, the emerging field of deep-time paleogenomics will expand the range of questions addressable using ancient DNA.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA, AncientGenomicsAnimalsBiodiversityDNAPaleontologyDNADNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID37797036
PMCPMC10586222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.