Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796909›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Clinical spine care partnerships between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Hannah Lin, Kristin Halvorsen, Myat Thu Win, Michael Yancey, Nada Rbil, Abhinaba Chatterjee, Bridget Jivanelli, Sariah Khormaee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah LinHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-7515
Kristin HalvorsenStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Myat Thu WinHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.
Michael YanceyHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.
Nada RbilHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.
Abhinaba ChatterjeeHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.
Bridget JivanelliHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-4859
Sariah KhormaeeHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-0965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical collaboration between spine professionals in high-income countries (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) may provide improvements in the accessibility, efficacy, and safety of global spine care. Currently, the scope and effectiveness of these collaborations remain unclear. In this review, we describe the literature on the current state of these partnerships to provide a framework for exploring future best practices.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for articles on spine-based clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs published between 2000 and March 10, 2023. This search yielded 1528 total publications. After systematic screening, nineteen articles were included in the final review.

resultsAll published partnerships involved direct clinical care and 13/19 included clinical training of local providers. Most of the published collaborations reviewed involved one of four major global outreach organizations with the majority of sites in Africa. Participants were primarily physicians and physicians-in-training. Only 5/19 studies reported needs assessments prior to starting their partnerships. Articles were split on evaluative focus, with some only evaluating clinical outcomes and some evaluating the nature of the partnership itself.

conclusionsPublished studies on spine-focused clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs remain scarce. Those that are published often do not report needs assessments and formal metrics to evaluate the efficacy of such partnerships. Toward improving the quality of spine care globally, we recommend an increase in the quality and quantity of published studies involving clinical collaborations between HICs and LICs, with careful attention to reporting early needs assessments and evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesIncomeAfricaBenchmarkingDeveloped CountriesHumans

Identifiers

PMID37796909
PMCPMC10553237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.