SynthesisPloS one2023
Effect of external therapies of traditional Chinese medicine on constipation in patients with CRF: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the curative effect of external therapies of traditional Chinese medicine on constipation in patients with chronic renal failure and to provide scientific theoretical basis for clinical practice.
methodWe searched the English database of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science and Chinese database of CNKI, Wan fang database, VIP Database and China Biomedical Literature Database up to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving constipation in patients with CRF that compared external therapies of traditional Chinese medicine and routine treatment to routine treatment were eligible for the analysis. A meta-analysis of the outcome indicators including total efficiency, weekly defecation times, defecation time, defecation difficulty score, patient-assessment of constipation quality of life and adverse events of treatment were performed. The analysis was performed by using Review Manager version 5.3.
resultA total of 23 studies were included, with 1764 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control group, the test group could significantly increase weekly defecation times(MD = 0.94, 95%CI(0.70, 1.18), Z = 7.74, P < 0.00001), reduce defecation time(MD = -2.92, 95%CI(-3.69, -2.16), Z = 7.49, P < 0.00001), reduce defecation difficulty score(MD = -1.92, 95%CI(-2.45, -1.39), Z = 7.11, P < 0.00001), improve the quality of life in patients with constipation(MD = -7.57, 95%CI(-10.23, -4.91), Z = 5.58, P < 0.00001) and obtain a higher total effective rate of treatment(OR = 4.53, 95%CI(3.27, 6.29), Z = 9.07, P < 0.00001). In terms of safety, there was no statistical significance in the incidence of adverse events between two groups(OR = 0.35, 95%CI(0.04, 2.95), Z = 0.96, P = 0.34).
conclusionThe combination of external therapies of traditional Chinese medicine and routine treatment could achieve an excellent curative effect, and there was no specific adverse event. However because of the limited level of current evidence, more high-quality trials are needed in the future.5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.