Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796897›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology reviews2023

Global diversity and inferred ecophysiology of microorganisms with the potential for dissimilatory sulfate/sulfite reduction.

Muhe Diao, Stefan Dyksma, Elif Koeksoy, David Kamanda Ngugi, Karthik Anantharaman, Alexander Loy, Michael Pester

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. mBio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diversity and ecology of microbial sulfur metabolism.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhe DiaoDepartment of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig D-38124, Germany.
Stefan DyksmaDepartment of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig D-38124, Germany.
Elif KoeksoyDepartment of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig D-38124, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-3820
David Kamanda NgugiDepartment of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig D-38124, Germany.
Karthik AnantharamanDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9584-2491
Alexander LoyDivision of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna A-1030, Austria.
Michael PesterDepartment of Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig D-38124, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-4145
Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31996-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfate/sulfite-reducing microorganisms (SRM) are ubiquitous in nature, driving the global sulfur cycle. A hallmark of SRM is the dissimilatory sulfite reductase encoded by the genes dsrAB. Based on analysis of 950 mainly metagenome-derived dsrAB-carrying genomes, we redefine the global diversity of microorganisms with the potential for dissimilatory sulfate/sulfite reduction and uncover genetic repertoires that challenge earlier generalizations regarding their mode of energy metabolism. We show: (i) 19 out of 23 bacterial and 2 out of 4 archaeal phyla harbor uncharacterized SRM, (ii) four phyla including the Desulfobacterota harbor microorganisms with the genetic potential to switch between sulfate/sulfite reduction and sulfur oxidation, and (iii) the combination as well as presence/absence of different dsrAB-types, dsrL-types and dsrD provides guidance on the inferred direction of dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. We further provide an updated dsrAB database including > 60% taxonomically resolved, uncultured family-level lineages and recommendations on existing dsrAB-targeted primers for environmental surveys. Our work summarizes insights into the inferred ecophysiology of newly discovered SRM, puts SRM diversity into context of the major recent changes in bacterial and archaeal taxonomy, and provides an up-to-date framework to study SRM in a global context.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaOxidation-ReductionPhylogenySulfatesSulfitesSulfurSulfatesSulfitesSulfurdissimilatory sulfite reductasedsrABmetagenomicssulfate reductionsulfur cyclesulfur oxidation

Identifiers

PMID37796897
PMCPMC10591310
OpenAlexW4387362915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.