Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796854›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Trophodynamics of the Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Antarctic Peninsula: Ontogenetic changes in diet composition and prey fatty acid profiles.

Karina Pérez-Pezoa, César A Cárdenas, Marcelo González-Aravena, Pablo Gallardo, Alí Rivero, Vicente Arriagada, Kostiantyn Demianenko, Pavlo Zabroda, Francisco Santa Cruz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karina Pérez-PezoaDepartamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
César A CárdenasDepartamento Científico, Instituto Antártico Chileno, Plaza Muñoz Gamero, Punta Arenas, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-6899
Marcelo González-AravenaDepartamento Científico, Instituto Antártico Chileno, Plaza Muñoz Gamero, Punta Arenas, Chile.
Pablo GallardoDepartamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Acuícolas, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile.
Alí RiveroDepartamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Acuícolas, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile.
Vicente ArriagadaDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID 0009-0000-6701-9636
Kostiantyn DemianenkoInstitute of Fisheries and Marine Ecology (IFME), Berdyansk, Ukraine.
Pavlo ZabrodaInstitute of Fisheries and Marine Ecology (IFME), Berdyansk, Ukraine.
Francisco Santa CruzDepartamento Científico, Instituto Antártico Chileno, Plaza Muñoz Gamero, Punta Arenas, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-0153
Instituto Antártico Chileno · CLUniversidad de Magallanes · CLMillennium Institute for Integrative Biology · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) is the largest notothenioid species in the Southern Ocean, playing a keystone role in the trophic web as a food source for marine mammals and a top predator in deep-sea ecosystems. Most ecological knowledge on this species relies on samples from areas where direct fishing is allowed, whereas in areas closed to fishing, such as the Antarctic Peninsula (AP), there are still key ecological gaps to ensure effective conservation, especially regarding our understanding of its trophic relationships within the ecosystem. Here, we present the first comprehensive study of the feeding behavior of Antarctic toothfish caught in the northern tip of the AP, during two consecutive fishing seasons (2019/20 and 2020/21). Stomach content was analyzed according to size-classes, sex and season. Macroscopic morphological analysis was used to identify prey, whereas DNA analysis was used in highly digested prey items. Fatty acid analysis was conducted to determine the prey's nutritional composition. The diet mainly consisted of Macrouridae, Cephalopoda, Anotopteridae, and Channichthyidae. Other prey items found were crustaceans and penguin remains; however, these were rare in terms of their presence in stomach samples. Sex had no effect on diet, whereas size-class and fishing season influenced prey composition. From 27 fatty acid profiles identified, we observed two different prey groups of fishes (integrated by families Anotopteridae, Macrouridae and Channichthyidae) and cephalopods. Our results revealed a narrow range of prey items typical of a generalist predator, which probably consumes the most abundant prey. Understanding the diet and trophic relationships of Antarctic toothfish is critical for a better comprehension of its role in the benthic-demersal ecosystem of the AP, key for ecosystemic fisheries management, and relevant for understanding and predicting the effect of climate change on this species.

Indexed as

EcosystemPerciformesAnimalsAntarctic RegionsDietFatty AcidsFood ChainHumansMammalsFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID37796854
PMCPMC10553334
OpenAlexW4387378978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.