ArticlePloS one2023
Health service improvement using positive patient feedback: Systematic scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Pooled it
- Public Perception of Health Care Before, During, and After COVID-19: Longitudinal Analysis of Online Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Patient and staff experiences of a community-based diagnostic clinic for chronic eye conditions: Qualitative analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Exploring patients' perspectives on patient rights in Latvia: from awareness to implementation and strengthening.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- What do patients value? A retrospective study of compliment letters from a single institution.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The Turkish version of the quality in psychiatric care-inpatient scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Association between diabetic patients' satisfaction with local medical services and experiences of unmet healthcare needs.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Client-Centered Care: A Strategic Framework and Measurement Approach to Guide Sexual and Reproductive Health Programming.Global health, science and practice · 2025Article
- "With compliment from...": A critical reflection on the function and use of compliment letters addressed to hospital staff.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- An Exploration of Online Positive Feedback in Relation to Mental Health Nursing Practice.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- What Drives Trust and Satisfaction in Health Welfare Social Cooperatives?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recognising the Value of Everyday Interactions in Inpatient CAMHS: Patient Thank-You Letters as Insights Into Nursing Impact.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Perception of the Rural Community Regarding the Role of Nursing Professionals: A Study in the High Andean Regions of Peru.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Increasing the Impact and Value of Laboratory Medicine Through Effective and AI-Assisted Communication.EJIFCC · 2025Review
- Article
- New experience of implementing patient e-referral in the Iranian health system: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Healthcare providers' communication experience in the pediatric intensive care unit: a phenomenological study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of SINERGIAPS, an intervention to improve patient safety in primary healthcare centers in Spain based on patients' perceptions and experiences: a protocol for a hybrid type I randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare services regularly receive patient feedback, most of which is positive. Empirical studies suggest that health services can use positive feedback to create patient benefit. Our aim was to map all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates change in healthcare settings.
methodsEmpirical studies in English were systematically identified through database searches (ACM Digital Library, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO), forwards and backwards citation, and expert consultation. We summarise the characteristics of included studies and the feedback they consider, present a thematic synthesis of qualitative findings, and provide narrative summaries of quantitative findings.
results68 papers were included, describing research conducted across six continents, with qualitative (n = 51), quantitative (n = 10), and mixed (n = 7) methods. Only two studies were interventional. The most common settings were hospitals (n = 27) and community healthcare (n = 19). The most common recipients were nurses (n = 29). Most outcomes described were desirable. These were categorised as (a) short-term emotional change for healthcare workers (including feeling motivated and improved psychological wellbeing); (b) work-home interactional change for healthcare workers (such as improved home-life relationships); (c) work-related change for healthcare workers (such as improved performance and staff retention). Some undesirable outcomes were described, including envy when not receiving positive feedback. The impact of feedback may be moderated by characteristics of particular healthcare roles, such as night shift workers having less interaction time with patients. Some factors moderating the change created by feedback are modifiable.
conclusionFurther interventional research is required to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of receiving positive feedback in creating specific forms of change such as increases in staff retention. Healthcare managers may wish to use positive feedback more regularly, and to address barriers to staff receiving feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.