Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796584›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023

A Multilabel Text Classifier of Cancer Literature at the Publication Level: Methods Study of Medical Text Classification.

Ying Zhang, Xiaoying Li, Yi Liu, Aihua Li, Xuemei Yang, Xiaoli Tang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying Zhang *Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5858-801X
Xiaoying Li *Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4407-6616
Yi LiuInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-6277
Aihua LiInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-3268
Xuemei YangInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-4166
Xiaoli TangInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-3482
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the threat posed by cancer to human health, there is a rapid growth in the volume of data in the cancer field and interdisciplinary and collaborative research is becoming increasingly important for fine-grained classification. The low-resolution classifier of reported studies at the journal level fails to satisfy advanced searching demands, and a single label does not adequately characterize the literature originated from interdisciplinary research results. There is thus a need to establish a multilabel classifier with higher resolution to support literature retrieval for cancer research and reduce the burden of screening papers for clinical relevance.

objectiveThe primary objective of this research was to address the low-resolution issue of cancer literature classification due to the ambiguity of the existing journal-level classifier in order to support gaining high-relevance evidence for clinical consideration and all-sided results for literature retrieval.

methodsWe trained a multilabel classifier with scalability for classifying the literature on cancer research directly at the publication level to assign proper content-derived labels based on the "Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) + X" model and obtain the best option for X. First, a corpus of 70,599 cancer publications retrieved from the Dimensions database was divided into a training and a testing set in a ratio of 7:3. Second, using the classification terminology of International Cancer Research Partnership cancer types, we compared the performance of classifiers developed using BERT and 5 classical deep learning models, such as the text recurrent neural network (TextRNN) and FastText, followed by metrics analysis.

resultsAfter comparing various combined deep learning models, we obtained a classifier based on the optimal combination "BERT + TextRNN," with a precision of 93.09%, a recall of 87.75%, and an F

conclusionsThe "BERT + TextRNN" model was trained for high-resolution classification of cancer literature at the publication level to support accurate retrieval and academic statistics. The model automatically assigns 1 or more labels to each cancer paper, as required. Quantitative comparison verified that the "BERT + TextRNN" model is the best fit for multilabel classification of cancer literature compared to other models. More data from diverse fields will be collected to testify the scalability and extensibility of the proposed model in the future.

Indexed as

cancer literaturedeep learningpublication-level classifiertext classification

Identifiers

PMID37796584
PMCPMC10587805
OpenAlexW4387357939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.