Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796533›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2024

Decision-making as discovery: Vetting clinical research in a leading precision oncology service.

Alberto Cambrosio, Jonah Campbell, Alexander E Drilon, Peter Keating, Jess B Polk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto CambrosioDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5922-0137
Jonah CampbellDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-8912
Alexander E DrilonEarly Drug Development Service and Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Peter KeatingDepartment of History, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jess B PolkDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Integration of Imaging and Circulating Plasma Cell-Free DNA Sequencing Using MSK-ACCESS to Monitor Treatment Response and Predict Progression in Patients With Multiple Cancers on Targeted TherapyR01CA273224 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Michael F. Berger, Alexander Drilon · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
Predicting sensitivity and resistance in RET-driven cancersR01CA251591 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DRILON, ALEXANDER · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
CIHR PJT-162252LUNGevity FoundationNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251591NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on fieldwork carried out at the Early Drug Development Service of a world-leading cancer institution, our study sheds lights on decision-making processes at the stage where decisions are made about which clinical trial to pursue and thus which experimental drugs will feed the growing pipeline of molecularly guided therapies and therapeutic strategies available to treating physicians. The paper shows how such collective decision-making practices by a translational research unit employ formal tools and ad hoc valuation strategies that interweave technical-scientific matters of concern with patient-oriented clinical ones, as part of the institutional assetization of biomedical knowledge production. In the process, decision-making practices in part define the conditions of possibility for the provision of care in what is increasingly becoming a 'clinic of variants.' They do so by reconfiguring on an evolving basis the socio-material ecosystem through which precision oncology is enacted as a rapidly evolving assemblage of patients, physicians, research and support staff, protocols, molecular markers, drugs and administrative components.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDecision MakingHumansMedical OncologyPrecision Medicinebiomedical innovationclinical trialsdecision-makingprecision oncologytranslational research

Identifiers

PMID37796533
PMCPMC11878200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.