ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Renal angina index for early identification of risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill children.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound cardiac output monitoring compared to the renal angina index for early prediction of pediatric acute kidney injury.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe main objective was to test whether the Renal Angina Index (RAI), calculated on patient admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), is associated with the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (stage ≥ 2) in 72 h. The specific aim was to analyze the performance of the RAI at a specialized oncology PICU.
methodsRetrospective cohort study involving two pediatric intensive care units located within a general hospital and an oncology hospital. Children aged ≥ 3 months to < 18 years admitted to the intensive care units in 2017 with a length of stay ≥ 72 h were included.
resultsThe sample included 249 patients, of which 51% were male (127 patients), with median age of 77 months, and mean ICU stay of 5 days. Of the total admissions, 141 were clinical (57%) and 108 surgical. The rate of AKI was 15% and death rate within 30 days was 13%. Having a positive RAI on admission showed a statistically significant association with AKI at Day 3 (OR = 18.5, 95%CI = 4.3 - 78.9, p < 0.001) and with death (OR = 3.9, 95%CI = 1.6 - 9.9, p = 0.004). The accuracy of the RAI in the cancer population was 0.81 on the ROC curve (95%CI 0.74, 0.88).
conclusionsThe RAI is a useful tool for predicting AKI and death in critically ill children, including in oncology units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.