Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796317›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2024

Adherence to drug therapy in patients with heart failure associated with reduced ejection fractions (HFrEF) during cardiac rehabilitation and after 3 and 6 months.

Michal Oszczygiel, Heinz Völler, Klaus Schröder, Irina-Silvia Popescu-Schuh, Eike Schromm, Viktoria Heinze, Bernhard Rauch, Axel Schlitt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michal OszczygielParacelsus Harzklinik Bad Suderode GmbH, Paracelsusstraße 1, 06485, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Heinz VöllerClinic Ruedersdorf and Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Klaus SchröderCenter for Outpatient Rehabilitation, Stuttgart, Germany.
Irina-Silvia Popescu-SchuhCenter for Outpatient Rehabilitation, Trier, Germany.
Eike SchrommCenter for Outpatient Rehabilitation, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Viktoria HeinzeParacelsus Harzklinik Bad Suderode GmbH, Paracelsusstraße 1, 06485, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Bernhard RauchCenter for Outpatient Rehabilitation, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Axel SchlittParacelsus Harzklinik Bad Suderode GmbH, Paracelsusstraße 1, 06485, Quedlinburg, Germany. axel.schlitt@pkd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-3519
Paracelsus-Harz-Klinik Bad Suderode · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEUniversität Trier · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeart failure represents a major challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Rehabilitation is recommended as an important pillar of therapy for these patients, especially for those with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction).

methodsThe data collected in this multi-center project provide information on the rates of patients with HFrEF who were treated in five German rehabilitation facilities and whether the patients adhered to drug therapy at 3-/6-month follow-up. The project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis-Pharma-GmbH.

resultsThe mean age of the 234 patients included was 63.4 ± 10.6 years and 78% were male. The mean LVEF was 31 ± 8% at admission and 36 ± 10% at discharge. Only 20.6% of the patients were assigned to rehabilitation with the main indication HF. The most frequent main indication was acute coronary syndrome (46.6%). A high proportion of patients was already on the recommended drug therapy upon admission (94% beta blockers, 100% angiotensin-effective drugs, 70% mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, etc.). This was optimized, in particular by a higher proportion of patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (35% admission vs. 45% discharge) and sacubitril/valsartan (49% admission vs. 64% discharge), which was further optimized during the 6-month follow-up (e.g., 50% SGLT2 inhibitors, 67% sacubitril/valsartan). DISCUSSION: These data illustrate the effect of rehabilitation in terms of optimizing drug therapy, which stabilized over the course of 6 months. Furthermore, only a few patients with the main diagnosis HFrEF are referred for cardiac rehabilitation, although it is an essential part of guideline-based therapy.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationDrug MonitoringHeart FailureStroke VolumeAgedAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsCardiovascular AgentsDrug CombinationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsCardiovascular AgentsDrug Combinationssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationValsartanDrug therapyHeart failureHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37796317
OpenAlexW4387356987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.