Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37796303›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2023

Behavioral responses of free-flying Drosophila melanogaster to shiny, reflecting surfaces.

Thomas F Mathejczyk, Édouard J Babo, Erik Schönlein, Nikolai V Grinda, Andreas Greiner, Nina Okrožnik, Gregor Belušič, Mathias F Wernet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas F Mathejczyk *Division of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Édouard J Babo *Division of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Erik SchönleinDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Nikolai V GrindaDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas GreinerDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Nina OkrožnikDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Gregor BelušičDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mathias F WernetDivision of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie and Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Strasse 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany. mathias.wernet@fu-berlin.de.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-7005Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP2205Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WE 5761/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active locomotion plays an important role in the life of many animals, permitting them to explore the environment, find vital resources, and escape predators. Most insect species rely on a combination of visual cues such as celestial bodies, landmarks, or linearly polarized light to navigate or orient themselves in their surroundings. In nature, linearly polarized light can arise either from atmospheric scattering or from reflections off shiny non-metallic surfaces like water. Multiple reports have described different behavioral responses of various insects to such shiny surfaces. Our goal was to test whether free-flying Drosophila melanogaster, a molecular genetic model organism and behavioral generalist, also manifests specific behavioral responses when confronted with such polarized reflections. Fruit flies were placed in a custom-built arena with controlled environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, and light intensity). Flight detections and landings were quantified for three different stimuli: a diffusely reflecting matt plate, a small patch of shiny acetate film, and real water. We compared hydrated and dehydrated fly populations, since the state of hydration may change the motivation of flies to seek or avoid water. Our analysis reveals for the first time that flying fruit flies indeed use vision to avoid flying over shiny surfaces.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsFlight, AnimalInsectaLightVision, OcularWaterWaterBehaviorDrosophilaPolarization visionThirst

Identifiers

PMID37796303
PMCPMC10643280
OpenAlexW4387356961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.